Decoding AI Inference: ARM vs x86 Throughput Comparisons#

What is Inference?#

Most people talk about “AI” in terms of machine learning models—particularly deep learning—performing tasks like image recognition, natural language processing, or recommendation systems. A deep learning workflow generally involves two phases:

• Training: Teaching a model from data by adjusting the model’s parameters (weights).
• Inference: Using the trained model to make predictions on new data.

During inference, the model simply performs forward passes (i.e., matrix multiplications, activation functions, convolutions) without adjusting parameters. This process is computationally intensive, especially when dealing with real-time data or large batch predictions. Speed and efficiency are critical because inference often happens in production environments, where low latency and high throughput contribute directly to user experience and system costs.

Inference on CPUs vs GPUs vs Specialized Accelerators#

While GPUs and specialized accelerators (like TPUs, NPUs, etc.) can deliver massive throughput, CPUs remain highly relevant for AI workloads. Often, CPUs handle smaller or moderate-scale inference tasks, power edge devices, or serve as fallback solutions when specialized hardware is unavailable. In many resource-constrained environments—think IoT or embedded systems—the CPU is the only feasible platform.

Why Compare ARM vs x86 for Inference?#

Historically, x86 (Intel, AMD) dominated server and desktop markets, whereas ARM rose to prominence in mobile devices. Over time, ARM’s improved performance, power efficiency, and expanding server market presence has led more and more developers to wonder: “How do AI inference speeds compare between ARM and x86?” In a modern world where distributed microservices run in heterogeneous environments, the question of which CPU architecture provides the best inference throughput can meaningfully impact cost, power consumption, and real-time performance.

Throughput vs Latency#

In an AI setting, throughput refers to how many inference queries or tasks you can perform per unit of time. Latency refers to how long it takes to run a single query from start to end. Different CPU architectures have different capabilities and trade-offs for these metrics. Some might excel at parallelizing many tasks (boosting throughput), while others exhibit short single-operation latency.

Power Efficiency#

ARM has traditionally emphasized low power consumption, making it a default choice for mobile devices. Recently, ARM-based chips (like Apple Silicon in Mac computers, or various ARM-based server chips) demonstrate that you can achieve high performance at relatively low power. x86 chips, on the other hand, can offer high clock speeds and strong per-core performance but typically consume more power—though modern x86 CPUs also have improved power-saving states. Power efficiency heavily affects total cost of ownership, especially in data centers, making it a central factor in architecture choice for AI inference.

Ecosystem and Tooling#

Each architecture has its own compiler toolchains, libraries, and frameworks:

• For x86, you can commonly leverage Intel MKL, oneDNN, or AMD’s libraries that are heavily optimized for x86 instructions like SSE, AVX, and AVX-512.
• For ARM, numerous libraries such as ARM Compute Library and optimized BLAS libraries exist for NEON and SVE instructions.

Your choice of architecture can determine the quality and breadth of the hardware-optimized libraries you can tap into for AI inference.

x86#

• CISC (Complex Instruction Set Computing): x86 instructions can be complex, packing multiple operations into single instructions.
• Dominance in Desktop/Server: Intel and AMD chips are widely deployed in enterprise servers, desktops, and laptops.
• Power Consumption: Generally higher TDP (Thermal Design Power) compared to ARM chips of equivalent performance. However, the lines are blurring with newer power-efficient x86 designs.

ARM#

• RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computing): ARM instructions are simpler, leading to high efficiency per watt.
• Wide Adoption in Mobile/Embedded: ARM is synonymous with smartphones and embedded systems.
• Server Market Penetration: With data center-oriented chips like AWS Graviton or Ampere Altra, ARM is becoming a competitive alternative to x86 in cloud and on-prem servers for certain workloads, including AI inference.

Modern ARM chips continue to narrow the performance gap with x86, especially in multi-core and specialized vector processing scenarios. Meanwhile, x86 invests heavily in vector extensions (AVX-512, etc.) to remain competitive. As a result, a performance face-off in AI inference workloads is timely and relevant.

x86 Extensions for AI#

• SSE (Streaming SIMD Extensions): Early attempt at vectorization on x86.
• AVX/AVX2: Enabled more data to be processed in parallel instructions.
• AVX-512: Expands vector width to 512 bits. Highly useful for matrix multiplications in neural networks, but also demands more power and specialized hardware.

ARM Extensions for AI#

• NEON: ARM’s SIMD (Single Instruction Multiple Data) instruction set for multimedia and signal processing. Commonly used and widely supported.
• SVE (Scalable Vector Extension): Offers variable vector lengths (128 to 2048 bits). It is memory-friendly and can adapt to the actual hardware implementation. SVE2 further refines these capabilities, making ARM a growing competitor for high-performance workloads.

Real-World Example#

When a neural network layer (say, a fully connected layer or convolution) needs to multiply large matrices, it can split the operation into smaller vectors that get processed in parallel. For instance, with AVX-512, you can operate on 16 FP32 or 32 FP16 floats in one go (depending on the instruction). On ARM’s NEON, you operate on sets of registers (128 bits wide), but with SVE, you can scale up.

The net impact on throughput is dramatic: more parallel operations per clock cycle implies higher throughput. However, these extensions must be supported by the software (frameworks, libraries) to deliver optimal performance.

Common Frameworks#

• TensorFlow
• PyTorch
• ONNX Runtime
• Apache TVM
• TFLite (TensorFlow Lite)

ARM Setup#

1. For ARM-based servers (e.g., AWS Graviton), you can compile libraries with ARM-optimized flags (e.g., -march=armv8.2-a+simd for NEON).
2. Install an ARM-optimized BLAS library (e.g., OpenBLAS, ARM Performance Libraries).
3. Pick a framework build that includes ARM-specific optimizations. TFLite often performs quite well on ARM.

x86 Setup#

1. Enable x86-optimized libraries. For example, on Intel, use Intel MKL or oneDNN.
2. For AMD, ensure AVX2 or AVX-512 (if available) is enabled in your build.
3. Configure your framework to use the correct vector extent (SSE, AVX2, or AVX-512).

In many cases, precompiled binaries are already optimized for the target architecture. However, maximum performance might require building from source with the right flags for your CPU.

Python Environment Setup#

1
# x86 environment example:
2
conda create -n x86_inference python=3.9
3
conda activate x86_inference
4
conda install pytorch torchvision torchaudio cpuonly -c pytorch
5

6
# ARM environment example (assuming an ARM-compatible conda or pip):
7
conda create -n arm_inference python=3.9
8
conda activate arm_inference
9
# Might require special channels or wheels for ARM
10
pip install torch torchvision torchaudio --extra-index-url https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cpu

Simple Model Definition#

1
import torch
2
import torch.nn as nn
3

4
class SimpleClassifier(nn.Module):
5
    def __init__(self, input_size=784, hidden_size=128, num_classes=10):
6
        super(SimpleClassifier, self).__init__()
7
        self.fc1 = nn.Linear(input_size, hidden_size)
8
        self.relu = nn.ReLU()
9
        self.fc2 = nn.Linear(hidden_size, num_classes)
10

11
    def forward(self, x):
12
        x = self.fc1(x)
13
        x = self.relu(x)
14
        x = self.fc2(x)
15
        return x
16

17
# Instantiate model
18
model = SimpleClassifier()
19
model.eval()
20

21
# Sample input (batch of 64 images, each flattened to 784 features for MNIST)
22
dummy_input = torch.randn(64, 784)

Inference Timing#

1
import time
2

3
with torch.no_grad():
4
    start_time = time.time()
5
    for _ in range(1000):
6
        _ = model(dummy_input)
7
    end_time = time.time()
8

9
print(f"Inference time for 1000 iterations: {end_time - start_time:.4f} seconds.")

You can run this script on both ARM and x86 backends. The final printed output is a rough measure of inference time. Of course, to properly measure throughput, you might incorporate profiling tools, pinned CPU affinity, or run more advanced configurations detailed in the next sections.

Microbenchmarking#

Microbenchmarking focuses on isolated operations such as matrix multiplication or convolution. You can isolate these computations inside tight loops, measure execution time, and gather data about potential throughput differences.

Macrobenchmarking#

Macrobenchmarking runs end-to-end scenarios (e.g., feed-forward pass through a full CNN on a dataset). This approach is more realistic but can obscure the root cause of performance differences. Combining micro- and macrobenchmark approaches yields the best insights.

Multi-Threading#

Many libraries (like BLAS) automatically utilize multiple threads if available. You can control the number of threads via environment variables:

1
# Restrict to 4 threads (example, for clarity)
2
export OMP_NUM_THREADS=4
3
python inference_script.py

On x86, typically you can exploit more threads without major overhead if the hardware supports them. On ARM, pay attention to the number of performance cores versus efficiency cores (in some SOC designs). Pinning threads to performance cores might improve throughput.

Example Throughput Calculation#

Suppose your script processes 64 images per iteration, and 1000 iterations complete in 7 seconds. Then total images processed = 64 * 1000 = 64,000. Throughput = 64,000 / 7 = ~9,142 images per second. This can be a baseline for comparing two architectures.

Interpreting the Table#

• ARM NEON has decent performance but not as high as AVX-512-based x86.
• ARM SVE shows a significant jump, narrowing the gap with x86.
• x86 solutions, especially with AVX-512, can generate higher throughput, although that might come at increased power cost.

Example: Using INT8 Inference with PyTorch#

1
import torch
2
import torch.quantization
3

4
# Assume 'model' is trained
5
model.eval()
6

7
# Prepare model for quantization
8
model.qconfig = torch.quantization.get_default_qconfig('fbgemm')  # For x86 with AVX2/VNNI
9
# For ARM with NEON or SVE, you could use a different backend if supported
10

11
prepared_model = torch.quantization.prepare(model, inplace=False)
12
quantized_model = torch.quantization.convert(prepared_model, inplace=False)
13

14
# Use quantized_model for inference
15
with torch.no_grad():
16
    output = quantized_model(dummy_input)

Quantization can yield major performance boosts—often 2x to 4x faster on supported architectures—while slightly affecting accuracy.

Heterogeneous Computing#

You might increase throughput by combining CPU architectures in a hybrid computing environment. For example, offload small tasks to ARM-based microservers for power efficiency, and use x86 servers for peak performance tasks.

Edge vs Cloud Scenarios#

• Edge devices (e.g., IoT sensors, industrial controllers) usually adopt ARM for its efficiency if they need on-device AI.
• Cloud-based inference might choose x86 for maximum throughput if you can afford the power and cooling overhead, or choose ARM-based servers if cost and power usage are paramount and performance is sufficient.

Containerization#

Modern deployments frequently use Docker or Kubernetes to run AI inference seamlessly across ARM and x86. Building multi-architecture container images ensures consistent usage:

1
docker buildx build --platform linux/amd64,linux/arm64 -t my_inference_image .

This approach makes it easier to test and compare across architectures without rewriting your entire stack.

Specialized Workloads#

If your workload involves heavy linear algebra, you’ll rely heavily on the CPU’s vector extensions. If your workload is more symbolic or branching-heavy, the architecture’s single-thread latency might be more critical. Understanding your application’s bottleneck is essential before making any final choice.