2366 words
12 minutes
“Accelerating AI at the Edge: FPGAs for Low-Latency Inference”

Accelerating AI at the Edge: FPGAs for Low-Latency Inference#

Introduction#

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transformed how we solve complex problems, from image classification and speech recognition to autonomous driving and predictive maintenance. However, the sheer growth in data generation and the need to perform real-time inference in environments with limited network connectivity present unique challenges. These challenges have given rise to “edge computing,” where data processing and inference happen as close to the data source as possible, minimizing latency and resource usage in centralized data centers.

In edge computing scenarios, the demand for low-latency and energy-efficient inference can be stringent. Traditional CPU or GPU solutions may not always be best suited for the edge due to power constraints, size limitations, or performance inefficiencies for certain workloads. Here is where Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) step in as highly customizable hardware solutions that can handle specialized tasks with great efficiency. FPGAs offer:

  1. Parallel execution of operations.
  2. Reconfigurability for different AI models.
  3. Low-latency performance crucial for time-sensitive tasks.
  4. Energy efficiency when compared to some high-end CPUs or GPUs.

This blog post explores how FPGAs can accelerate AI workloads at the edge with low latency. We will start with basic concepts, then gradually move to advanced topics like hardware-accelerated neural networks, quantization strategies, design flows, partial reconfiguration, and more. By the end, you will understand why FPGAs represent a powerful solution for edge-based AI and how to start using them in real-world applications.


Table of Contents#

  1. What Is Low-Latency Inference?
  2. Why Deploy AI at the Edge?
  3. FPGA Fundamentals
  4. FPGA vs. CPU vs. GPU
  5. High-Level Design Flow for FPGA AI Accelerators
  6. Basic FPGA Acceleration Example
  7. Advanced Concepts
  8. Getting Started with FPGA Development Environments
  9. Example: Simple HLS Code for a Convolution
  10. Industry Use Cases
  11. Professional-Level Expansions
  12. Conclusion

What Is Low-Latency Inference?#

Low-latency inference refers to the ability of a system to process inputs and generate outputs (inferences) with minimal delay. While “throughput” measures how many inferences per second can be handled, “latency” measures how quickly each inference is computed from the time the input is ready. Low latency is critical in real-time systems, such as:

  • Autonomous vehicles reacting to their environment.
  • Medical devices interpreting patient data.
  • Industrial robots on fast-moving assembly lines.

Achieving low latency is often a function of both the hardware and software design. On the hardware side, specialized accelerators (such as FPGAs) can be configured to handle specific AI workloads very efficiently.


Why Deploy AI at the Edge?#

Deploying AI at the edge is often motivated by challenges in transmitting data to distant data centers, potential privacy concerns, and the need for real-time responsiveness. Here are a few important reasons:

  1. Reduced Latency: Edge devices can make quicker decisions without waiting for round-trip communication to a cloud server.
  2. Bandwidth Savings: Only essential insights are transmitted over the network instead of raw data, reducing bandwidth usage.
  3. Privacy and Security: Processing data locally can help safeguard sensitive information.
  4. Energy Efficiency: Edge devices can be optimized for specialized tasks, potentially using less energy than large server deployments for the same tasks.

FPGAs fit into this paradigm because they can be tailored to specific workloads, conserve energy by turning off unused logic, and handle data in real-time.


FPGA Fundamentals#

What Is an FPGA?#

A Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) is an integrated circuit that you can configure “in the field” after manufacturing. Unlike general-purpose CPUs, which have a fixed instruction set, or GPUs, which are specialized for graphics and massively parallel workloads, an FPGA consists of a grid of Configurable Logic Blocks (CLBs), interconnect resources, and specialized hardware blocks such as Digital Signal Processors (DSPs) and memory elements.

FPGA Architecture (High-Level)#

  1. CLBs (Configurable Logic Blocks): Each CLB can be programmed to perform small logic functions, such as simple gates or lookup tables (LUTs).
  2. DSP Slices: FPGAs usually include dedicated hardware blocks for arithmetic operations (like multiply-accumulate). These are extremely useful in machine learning workloads.
  3. Block RAM: On-chip memory blocks can store intermediate data, parameters, or partial results to minimize external memory accesses.
  4. Interconnects: A network of routing channels that interconnect the CLBs, DSP slices, and Block RAM.
  5. I/O Blocks: Manage communication with external devices, sensors, or other parts of the system.

FPGA Reconfiguration#

One of the key features of FPGAs is reconfigurability. You can program them with bitstreams containing hardware-level descriptions of your design. This allows design teams to adapt the FPGA to different workloads, or even reconfigure the hardware in the field to provide hardware updates or multi-function support.


FPGA vs. CPU vs. GPU#

Below is a simplified comparison table highlighting why FPGAs may outperform CPUs or GPUs in some edge AI scenarios. Note that actual performance depends heavily on workload, design, and constraints.

AspectCPUGPUFPGA
ArchitectureMulti-purposeMassive parallelism for graphics/computeCustom parallel data paths configured by the developer
LatencyMediumMedium to high (depending on context)Low (can be optimized for specialized tasks)
Energy EfficiencyModerateHigh computational power, but can be energy-hungryOften more efficient than GPU for targeted inference tasks
FlexibilityVery flexible (general purpose)Flexible for parallel workloadsHighly flexible, can reconfigure hardware at will
ProgrammingRelatively easy (C/C++/Python, etc.)Moderately easy (CUDA, OpenCL, etc.)More complex design (HDL, HLS, specialized toolchains)
Typical Use CaseControl logic, general computingHigh-performance computing, graphicsSpecialized tasks, custom AI acceleration

Key Takeaways:

  • FPGAs can be highly optimized to achieve low latency.
  • Development complexity is higher, but modern tools (High-Level Synthesis, specialized compilers) simplify the process.
  • If your application needs real-time inference, reconfigurability, and energy efficiency, FPGAs might be the best fit.

High-Level Design Flow for FPGA AI Accelerators#

Design flow for FPGA-based AI acceleration can often be summarized in the following steps:

  1. Algorithm and Model Development

    • Design or select a neural network architecture (e.g., CNN, RNN, Transformer).
    • Train and validate the model in a framework like TensorFlow or PyTorch.
  2. Model Optimization

    • Quantize or prune the model for efficient FPGA deployment.
    • Possibly use specialized FPGA-friendly layers or constraints to reduce resource usage.
  3. High-Level Synthesis (HLS) or HDL Design

    • Convert the model or relevant kernels (e.g., convolutions, matrix multiplications) into a hardware-ready form (Verilog, VHDL, or HLS-based C/C++).
    • Insert pipeline stages or parallelism to reduce latency and utilize FPGA resources effectively.
  4. Verification and Simulation

    • Use simulation tools to verify correctness and approximate performance.
    • Some frameworks provide reference designs or test benches to help.
  5. FPGA Synthesis and Implementation

    • Synthesize your code into a netlist.
    • Map and place-and-route to generate the final FPGA bitstream.
  6. Deployment

    • Load the bitstream onto the FPGA device.
    • Integrate with other system components (operating systems, sensors, host CPU, etc.).
  7. Testing and Iteration

    • Test performance under real-world conditions.
    • Iterate on the design, reconfiguring the FPGA if needed to refine performance or address new use cases.

Basic FPGA Acceleration Example#

To illustrate a simple concept, consider an FPGA-based accelerator for a single-layer perceptron. While single-layer perceptrons are no longer the cutting edge of AI, they are simple enough to demonstrate fundamental principles.

Verilog Implementation Snippet (Conceptual)#

Below is a pseudo-code snippet in Verilog that computes a single-layer perceptron’s output for a small number of inputs. This example is not optimized for speed or pipelining, but serves as an educational illustration.

module perceptron #(
parameter N = 8, // Number of inputs
parameter WIDTH = 8 // Bit-width of each input
) (
input wire [N*WIDTH-1:0] in_features,
input wire [N*WIDTH-1:0] weights,
input wire [WIDTH-1:0] bias,
output reg [WIDTH-1:0] out
);
integer i;
reg signed [WIDTH-1:0] feature_val;
reg signed [WIDTH-1:0] weight_val;
reg signed [2*WIDTH-1:0] mul_result; // extended width
reg signed [2*WIDTH-1:0] accum;
always @(*) begin
accum = 0;
for (i = 0; i < N; i = i + 1) begin
feature_val = in_features[(i*WIDTH) +: WIDTH];
weight_val = weights[(i*WIDTH) +: WIDTH];
mul_result = feature_val * weight_val;
accum = accum + mul_result;
end
accum = accum + bias;
// Simple activation - threshold at 0
if (accum[2*WIDTH-1] == 1'b1) begin
// If negative, output zero for demonstration
out = 0;
end else begin
out = accum[WIDTH-1:0]; // Truncate or saturate
end
end
endmodule

Explanation#

  • parameter N sets the number of inputs, and parameter WIDTH sets the bit-width.
  • We take advantage of a for loop inside an always block to accumulate weighted sums.
  • This design is purely combinational, so it might not achieve optimal timing or resource utilization.
  • A real design would likely add pipelining registers or use dedicated DSP blocks for multiplication.

While trivial, this snippet highlights how you can directly manipulate the hardware pipeline. In more advanced AI accelerators (like CNNs with multiple layers), you would break down each layer into hardware modules, pipeline them, and exploit the FPGA’s on-chip memory effectively.


Advanced Concepts#

Quantization and Model Optimization#

One way to reduce computational load and memory usage is to quantize the model to lower bit-widths (e.g., 8-bit, 4-bit, or even 1-bit in extreme cases). FPGAs are particularly well-suited for quantized networks because:

  • You can define custom precision for weights and activations.
  • You can replicate small hardware multipliers many times for parallel operations, given lower bit-widths.

Pruning (removing less important weights) and model compression further reduce resource usage, translating into smaller FPGA footprints and faster clock speeds.


Pipelining and Parallelism#

Pipelining#

In an FPGA, pipeline stages can be inserted between operations to ensure high clock frequencies. Each stage processes a chunk of data in parallel. For instance, in a convolution operation, you can break it so that each pipeline stage does a partial multiplication-accumulation step, passing intermediate results down the line.

Parallelism#

FPGAs excel at exploiting fine-grained parallelism. If your design requires 100 multiply-accumulate (MAC) units operating concurrently, you can replicate that logic (assuming you have enough DSP blocks). This can produce enormous throughput and low inference latency when data is fed at just the right rate.


Memory Considerations#

Efficient use of on-chip and off-chip memory is crucial to FPGA design. Key aspects include:

  1. On-Chip Memory (BRAM, URAM): Use for low-latency data access, storing partial results, or caching frequently accessed parameters.
  2. Off-Chip DRAM: Larger but higher latency memory.
  3. Streamlined Dataflow: Design your data path so that data moves seamlessly from memory to compute units.

Sophisticated memory hierarchies and dataflow orchestrations can distinguish a mediocre design from a cutting-edge one.


Getting Started with FPGA Development Environments#

Modern FPGA toolchains provide myriad ways to implement AI accelerators:

  1. Xilinx Vitis AI: A development stack for AI inference on Xilinx devices. Integrates optimizations for quantized models, offers pre-built accelerators, and speeds up FPGA implementations of popular networks.
  2. Intel OpenVINO with FPGA Plugins: Intel’s ecosystem for AI acceleration can target CPUS, GPUs, and FPGAs.
  3. High-Level Synthesis (HLS) Tools: Tools like Xilinx Vitis HLS or Intel HLS let you describe hardware in C/C++ and automatically generate HDL code.
  4. OpenCL: Some vendors offer OpenCL-based workflows for writing kernels that run on the FPGA, with hardware blocks automatically generated.

Development Boards#

To experiment, you might use a commercially available FPGA development kit, such as:

  • Xilinx Kria, Zynq, or Alveo-based boards.
  • Intel Stratix or Arria kits.
  • Lower-cost FPGA boards (e.g., from Lattice or Microchip) for simpler AI tasks.

Example: Simple HLS Code for a Convolution#

Below is a moderately simplified High-Level Synthesis code sample in C that demonstrates a 2D convolution kernel. This code can be synthesized to RTL by tools like Xilinx Vitis HLS or Intel HLS.

#include <hls_stream.h>
#include <ap_int.h>
#define IMG_WIDTH 64
#define IMG_HEIGHT 64
#define KERNEL_SIZE 3
#define BIT_WIDTH 16
void conv2d_hls(
ap_int<BIT_WIDTH> input[IMG_HEIGHT][IMG_WIDTH],
ap_int<BIT_WIDTH> kernel[KERNEL_SIZE][KERNEL_SIZE],
ap_int<BIT_WIDTH> output[IMG_HEIGHT - KERNEL_SIZE + 1][IMG_WIDTH - KERNEL_SIZE + 1]
) {
#pragma HLS PIPELINE II=1
for(int row = 0; row < IMG_HEIGHT - KERNEL_SIZE + 1; row++) {
for(int col = 0; col < IMG_WIDTH - KERNEL_SIZE + 1; col++) {
ap_int<2*BIT_WIDTH> sum = 0;
for(int kr = 0; kr < KERNEL_SIZE; kr++) {
for(int kc = 0; kc < KERNEL_SIZE; kc++) {
ap_int<BIT_WIDTH> pixel = input[row + kr][col + kc];
ap_int<BIT_WIDTH> weight = kernel[kr][kc];
sum += pixel * weight;
}
}
output[row][col] = sum; // Potentially apply activation or truncation
}
}
}

Key Points#

  • We defined the image array and kernel array as ap_int<BIT_WIDTH> for fixed-point arithmetic.
  • The #pragma HLS PIPELINE directive instructs the HLS compiler to insert pipeline stages and attempt a specified initiation interval (II=1). This means one convolution operation can theoretically start each clock cycle.
  • Tools will attempt to infer DSP blocks for multiplication and use BRAM for local buffering if the array sizes are large.
  • Production-grade designs will include border-handling, activation functions, potential integer scaling, or other specialized logic.

Industry Use Cases#

  1. Autonomous Vehicles: Low-latency object detection is necessary for safety. FPGAs can run lightweight CNNs or specialized detection networks directly inside vehicles.
  2. IoT Sensors: Environment monitoring sensors can include an FPGA for analyzing data in real-time, enabling immediate responses.
  3. Healthcare: Portable medical devices can perform analysis locally—e.g., ECG pattern recognition—in real time at low power.
  4. Industrial Automation: Robotics systems can integrate FPGA-based AI for fast, deterministic control loops.

Professional-Level Expansions#

Once you have mastered the basics of designing AI accelerators on an FPGA, you may want to explore the following advanced topics to push the performance envelope or adapt to evolving requirements.

Partial Reconfiguration#

Partial Reconfiguration (PR) allows sections of the FPGA to be reprogrammed while other sections remain operational. This can be useful for AI inference scenarios where:

  • Different models must be swapped in and out.
  • You want to time-multiplex resources dynamically.
  • Updates can occur without halting the entire system.

With PR, you can load a specialized accelerator for certain layers, then reconfigure a portion of the FPGA for different layers or tasks. This approach can drastically reduce downtime and improve resource reuse.


Dynamic Precision and Reconfigurability#

Not all neural network layers need the same precision. Some might do fine with 4-bit weights, while others require 8 or 16 bits. FPGAs allow dynamic reconfiguration of precision across layers:

  • Utilize 8-bit multipliers where needed.
  • Switch to 16-bit for high-dynamic-range computations (e.g., the first layer of a CNN).
  • Adjust on-the-fly with specialized bitstreams or using a universal wide datapath that is underutilized for lower bit widths but can switch modes quickly.

This flexibility is especially beneficial in multi-tenant edge systems running varied AI workloads.


Elastic Scaling in FPGA Clusters#

While a single FPGA can provide a high degree of parallelism, you can also scale out by networking multiple FPGA boards, often in data centers or specialized edge nodes:

  1. Systolic Arrays: Large-scale arrays of interconnected FPGA compute blocks for matrix multiplications.
  2. FPGA Clusters: Communicate via high-speed interconnects like PCIe, Ethernet, or InfiniBand.
  3. Load Balancing: Advanced scheduling can allocate incoming tasks to whichever FPGA is free, ensuring maximum throughput.

This has become common in large enterprise setups where specialized AI tasks run continuously.


Conclusion#

FPGAs stand out as an exceptional solution for low-latency, high-performance AI inference at the edge. By tailoring hardware to specific neural network topologies, leveraging parallelism, and exploiting partial reconfiguration, developers can unlock efficiency levels and performance that are difficult to match with traditional CPU or GPU-based solutions. While FPGA design can be more involved, modern tools and platforms significantly shorten the learning curve.

If your application demands real-time decision-making, minimal energy consumption, and the flexibility to adapt to changing AI models, exploring FPGA accelerators should be a top consideration. From basic single-layer perceptrons to advanced multi-layer, quantized networks, FPGAs can be a cornerstone technology for next-generation intelligent devices.

“Accelerating AI at the Edge: FPGAs for Low-Latency Inference”
https://science-ai-hub.vercel.app/posts/302acf12-7abe-49e0-ad5f-3ee230ab8590/1/
Author
AICore
Published at
2025-01-27
License
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0